NEW DELHI: KENT lists the Ace Plus Neo 2Y at Rs 21,499 and Supreme Plus Neo 2Y at Rs 20,499, including tax. Their official technical tables show the same storage, purification output, power consumption and dimensions. The cheaper listing therefore does not carry a lower published rating on those measures.
| Official specification | Ace Plus Neo 2Y | Supreme Plus Neo 2Y |
|---|---|---|
| Displayed price | Rs 21,499 | Rs 20,499 |
| Product code | 111196B | 111194B |
| Storage | 8 litres | 8 litres |
| Purification rate | 20 litres/hour | 20 litres/hour |
| Power consumption | 60W | 60W |
| Dimensions, L x W x H | 360 x 320 x 500 mm | 360 x 320 x 500 mm |
| Advertised warranty | 2 years comprehensive | 2 years comprehensive |
Price as of 28 October 2026, 00:52 IST. The Supreme page was marked sold out when checked. Its figure is a listed price, not confirmation that an order can currently be fulfilled. Availability needs a separate check from the price comparison.
The full model suffix is essential
These are specifically the Neo 2Y products. KENT also displays similarly named purifiers elsewhere on its store, including models without the same suffix. A price attached to a shorter family name is not enough to identify the product being compared. The product codes above provide a firmer reference for a quotation or invoice.
Both pages describe RO and UF purification with inline UV, alkaline and copper features, TDS control and UV treatment in the storage tank. That shared description is useful for identifying the advertised system. It does not establish that every internal component is interchangeable, or that the products have identical service parts.
Matching specifications narrow the comparison
The unusual detail here is how closely the published technical tables align. A higher price often invites an assumption about a larger tank or faster output. Neither difference appears in these listings. A reader should ask for the precise additional feature behind the higher quotation rather than filling the gap with an assumed upgrade.
For example, a family choosing a purifier for the same kitchen location cannot infer a space advantage from the different names. The dimensions shown match. The relevant installation question is whether the available wall or counter location, access to the water supply and room for servicing suit the actual unit that will be supplied.
Storage and purification rate also answer different questions. Stored water is what the appliance can hold; the production rating describes replenishment under the conditions used for that specification. A storage tank should not be treated as proof of uninterrupted production during a power interruption, even though already stored water may remain available.
A feature list is not a water test
The comparison here is of the manufacturer's listings, rather than a laboratory assessment of either purifier. Choosing a treatment system for a particular home calls for understanding its incoming water. A brand name, copper label or shared price bracket does not itself establish how either machine will perform with that supply.
This matters in a household trying to compare a replacement purifier with an older installation. The useful record includes the exact supplied model, any installation requirements and the consumables that will need attention. A headline purchase price cannot settle future maintenance costs when the product listing does not provide a complete schedule for them.
The advertised warranty is another matching item, but a duration is only part of the service arrangement. Keep the written terms supplied with the actual appliance and record any separate charge quoted during installation. Our LG appliance warranty explainer illustrates the need to distinguish kinds of coverage, with terms specific to LG.
What the official pages can settle
On the evidence available, the comparison establishes different displayed prices alongside matching core ratings. It does not establish a measured taste difference, a lower running cost, or a performance advantage for either purifier. Those claims would need evidence beyond the product tables and promotional descriptions.
For related household appliance coverage, read our Whirlpool returns guide and Atomberg Zephyr model report. Each deals with a different appliance question; neither supplies terms or specifications for these KENT purifiers.
Official sources: KENT Ace Plus Neo 2Y, KENT Supreme Plus Neo 2Y and the KENT purifier collection.
