Phoolpur Police Recover Missing 16-Year-Old From Pindra After Three Days

By Harsh Mehra6 min read
Empty small-town police outpost verandah soft morning light, no seals or boards, no people, no logos, no text
Illustrative image: Empty small-town police outpost verandah in soft morning light.

Phoolpur police closed a three-day missing-child alert on Saturday after tracing a 16-year-old student from Pindra Bazar and returning him safely to his family.

According to a Gomti Zone Commissionerate brief, Shaurya Srivastava, also known as Piyush, left for school on 16 September and did not come home that evening. Relatives searched through the night and the following day before lodging a report. Phoolpur registered Case 297/2026 under section 137(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

Station House Officer Inspector Ajay Rai Verma put a team on CCTV pulls, field surveillance and the C-Plan policing app. Sub-inspectors Jitendra Yadav and Ram Singh Yadav and constable Ashish Kumar Pal were named in the recovery note. On 19 September the boy was found safe. After formalities he was handed to guardian Pramod Kumar Mathur, who thanked the station for the quick turnaround, the brief said.

Missing teenagers in the Phoolpur–Pindra belt often turn up at relatives’ homes, coaching centres or informal work sites once camera trails are read. Police did not publish a narrative of where Shaurya spent the three days, and inventing one would be reckless. What the record shows is the timeline: missing from 16 September, FIR, recovery on 19 September, safe handover.

Section 137(2) BNS covers kidnapping or abduction in the new code’s numbering for the kind of missing-person FIR stations open when a child does not return. Filing the case unlocks CCTV requisitions and inter-station alerts that informal enquiries cannot force. In this instance the paperwork and the street work appear to have moved together.

For parents in the block, the usable lesson is dull and practical: report early, preserve the last school or phone clue, and let the station freeze camera footage before it overwrites. Phoolpur’s note leans on exactly those tools.

No injury to the boy was mentioned. No second accused was named in the recovery update. If a kidnapping angle develops later, it will show up as an additional section or a fresh arrest — neither of which is on Saturday’s brief. As of Monday morning the story ends where police left it: a named adolescent home, a closed missing entry, and a dated case number.

Pindra Bazar sits on the northern fringe of the commissionerate, where school routes cross highway edges and village lanes. Families there often wait a night before approaching the thana, hoping the child walks back. The Srivastava complaint did not wait forever; the FIR on record gave police the legal hook for camera pulls.

Officers did not describe the boy as injured or unwell at handover. School attendance after the recovery was not part of the brief. Those follow-ups belong to the family and the school, not to a crime update.

For the desk, the piece stays a recovery notice: three days missing, one case number, one safe return. Anything beyond that would be colour we do not have.

Sources and reporting

Police social media cell (Gomti Zone) brief Sat 19 Sep 2026. Missing since 16 Sep after school; Case 0297/2026 s.137(2) BNS. Recovered 19 Sep via CCTV, surveillance, C-Plan app. SHO Inspector Ajay Rai Verma; SI Jitendra Yadav; SI Ram Singh Yadav; Ct Ashish Kumar Pal. Child handed to Pramod Kumar Mathur. Soft recovery story within batch window.

Related Stories