Chetganj police have registered a first information report on a brother’s complaint alleging that a man harassed his teenage sister at a Ramkatora dance class and threatened to circulate AI-generated objectionable images of her online.
According to the complaint summarised by police, the girl had gone to the dance class around 5 pm on Tuesday. The brother, a Chowkaghat resident, alleged that Mainuddin Khan arrived there, held his sister’s hand, tried to drag her and later claimed he had prepared objectionable images of her using artificial intelligence. The complaint further alleged that the accused threatened to circulate those images on online platforms and kept calling from changing numbers.
Station Officer Pawan Pandey said the FIR was registered on the basis of the written tahreer and that investigation was under way. Police have not publicly detailed arrests, device seizures or forensic steps. All allegations remain subject to probe and court process.
Cases that mix an in-person harassment allegation with an AI-image threat are increasingly common on cyber crime desks across Uttar Pradesh. Investigators typically look for call detail records, handset seizures, any stored image files, and statements from class staff or other students who were present. Because the complainant’s sister is a teenager, reporting here keeps her unnamed and avoids graphic description of the alleged images.
Ramkatora sits inside a busy Chetganj pocket where coaching rooms and small activity classes share lanes with evening traffic. Parents who send teenagers to after-school activity centres often rely on the class organiser’s gate control; when an outsider allegedly walks in, the first questions for police are who had access to the room and whether any CCTV covered the entrance. Those are investigative leads, not findings.
Families facing similar threats are usually advised to preserve screenshots, note call times and numbers, and approach the local police station or the district cyber cell without deleting chat threads. Changing numbers complicate simple call logs, which is why handset forensic imaging and UPI or social-media account trails matter in AI-threat complaints. Chetganj police are the registering station for this FIR; further action will depend on what the investigation recovers.
Activity-class organisers in Chetganj are likely to face routine questions about visitor logs and whether an outsider’s entry was challenged. Those questions are part of a standard harassment probe when the alleged incident is tied to a class room rather than a public street. The FIR itself does not, on the public summary, list seizure memos or medical examination details; those may follow as the investigation proceeds.
