Shivpur Registers Court-Ordered FIR After Husband Alleges Harassment by Excise Constable Wife

Shivpur police have registered a first information report on a Varanasi court’s direction after a labourer alleged that his wife, now an excise constable in Prayagraj, and her relatives harassed and threatened him once she got the government job.

The complainant, Mata Prasad Yadav of Chamav under Shivpur, told police he studied only to Class 10 and married Mamata Yadav of Shankarpur in the Chaubeapur belt in May 2011. He says he paid for her BA, MA and BEd from his wages and helped her prepare for competitive exams. In 2022 she was selected as a woman constable in the excise department and posted in Prayagraj.

According to his complaint, her behaviour changed after the appointment. He alleges that in January 2024 she left home with ₹48,000 and jewellery. When he objected, he says, she invoked her post and threatened to have him and his relatives jailed on false cases. He first approached the police station; when that did not satisfy him, he moved the court. An additional chief judicial magistrate’s order then directed Shivpur police to register a case.

Station house officer Ajit Kumar Verma said the FIR names Mamata Yadav, her father Nakhadu, and her brothers Ashish and Satish. Investigation will follow the court’s direction and the written complaint.

The case, as registered, rests on the husband’s allegations. The accused have not been convicted of anything in this matter, and they retain the right to contest every claim — including the alleged threats, the January 2024 departure with cash and jewellery, and the sequence of station and court petitions. Police paperwork at this stage records a court-ordered FIR, the four named accused, and a probe that will have to test both sides.

For the Shivpur desk, the immediate fact is procedural: after the magistrate’s order, the station has opened a harassment-and-threat case arising from a domestic complaint that links a government constable’s job to alleged misuse of authority inside a marriage. How the evidence reads will be for investigators and, later, the court.

Domestic complaints that travel through a magistrate’s order often arrive after a station has declined or delayed a first information report. Mata Prasad’s account follows that path: unpaid attention at the thana, then the ACJM’s direction, then Tuesday’s paperwork under SHO Ajit Kumar Verma. The court order explains why the FIR exists; it does not decide who is telling the truth about January 2024 or the alleged jail threats.

Mamata Yadav’s status as an excise constable in Prayagraj is relevant only to the allegation that she misused the post. It is not a finding of misconduct by her department. Her father and brothers are named as co-accused on the husband’s version of household pressure; they too remain unconvicted. Balanced reporting requires that frame every time the case is summarised.

Shivpur’s file will now collect statements, call records if any, and whatever documents support or undercut the jewellery-and-cash claim. Readers should expect the accused side to deny harassment. Until a charge sheet and a trial say otherwise, this is a court-ordered FIR arising from a bitter marital dispute — not a finished verdict on either spouse.