FIR Against Cab Driver After Sector 69 Toddler Hurt

GURUGRAM: Badshahpur police have registered an FIR against cab driver Arun after a Maruti WagonR cab bearing registration HR38AK6639 allegedly injured two-year-old Ayansh in Sector 69 on 3 September, with the formal case filed nearly a month later once the child's father, Yogendra, completed medical paperwork and pressed the complaint.

Police say the boy was playing near the sector stretch when the cab allegedly struck him. ASI Anil Kumar is investigating. The FIR follows the father's complaint after treatment. Officers have not claimed the delay was deliberate on the family's part; they describe it as a case registered once documents and the complaint were ready.

Arun is named in the complaint as the driver. Guilt is not established. The registration number and vehicle make are part of the police record of the allegation. No graphic medical detail was released in the public briefing, and this report does not invent injury descriptions beyond stating that the toddler was hurt and treated.

Delayed FIR, investigation steps, careful language

Month-long gaps between a road crash and an FIR are common when families first focus on hospital care and only later gather papers for the police station. Investigators still have to explain timeline gaps in the case diary if a court asks. For now, Badshahpur owns the file and ASI Anil Kumar is the named IO.

Cab operators in Sector 69 and nearby residential pockets often run short local trips. Police will typically pull CCTV from neighbouring societies, check the cab's trip logs if a aggregator app was used, and record statements from anyone who saw the WagonR that afternoon. Those steps were listed as ongoing rather than finished.

Road crashes involving young children draw heavy public anger, which is why allegation language matters. The FIR records what the complainant alleges and what police have taken on file. It is not a conviction. Readers should not treat Arun as proven guilty, and no photograph or likeness of the child belongs in any illustration of this story.

Yogendra's complaint seeks accountability for the 3 September incident. Whether charges stick will depend on evidence the IO collects under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita provisions applied in the FIR. Until charge sheet and trial, the public facts are a delayed FIR, a named cab and driver, a treated toddler, and an open Badshahpur investigation.

Sector 69 sits in a dense residential belt where children often play near parked cars and service lanes. Drivers of cabs and private cars are expected to crawl in those pockets. Police say speed and attention will be examined from whatever camera and witness material the IO gathers. No reconstruction sketch was released with the FIR note.

Families in similar crashes should preserve hospital records, photographs of the scene taken safely, and any dashcam clips before approaching the station. Yogendra's path from treatment to FIR is the sequence police have acknowledged. The case now moves on evidence, not on public anger alone.