Family Seeks Impartial Probe After 25-Year-Old Dies in Fall at Sohna High-Rise

GURUGRAM: The family of a 25-year-old man who died after falling from the 12th floor of a residential building in Sohna has asked police for an impartial investigation into how he reached the upper floor and who was present before the fall. Police said the cause and sequence of events remain under inquiry.

The man, identified by authorities as Deepak, was a resident of Band Colony. His family said he went to Hill Town Society at night with a friend from Peer Colony. The friend later telephoned relatives and told them Deepak had fallen from the building.

Family raises questions about the visit

Relatives reached the society and submitted a complaint, describing the circumstances as suspicious. They have asked investigators to establish the purpose of the visit, how Deepak entered and reached the 12th floor, and who interacted with him at the property.

The family's questions are legitimate lines of inquiry, but they are not proof of wrongdoing. No official finding released so far establishes whether the fall was accidental, self-inflicted or involved another person. Speculation about any of those possibilities would be premature and unfair to the deceased and people being questioned.

Post-mortem and electronic records may be central

Sohna police took custody of the body and sent it for post-mortem examination. An officer said the actual cause of death would be assessed after the medical report. The examination can document injuries and help determine whether they are consistent with the reported fall, but the broader sequence may require additional evidence.

Entry registers, security-camera footage, lift records, phone location data and calls made before and after the incident may help reconstruct the timeline. Investigators should secure those records quickly because some digital systems overwrite footage after a limited period. Statements from security staff, residents and the friend who accompanied Deepak will also need to be compared.

Privacy and accuracy matter after a sudden death

High-rise deaths often attract online speculation before families receive basic answers. Sharing unverified messages, private photographs or claims about the deceased can cause lasting harm and may interfere with the investigation. Public reporting should stay with confirmed facts and clearly attribute questions to the family or police.

Residential societies can assist by preserving records, documenting access controls and providing a single authorised liaison to investigators and relatives. That cooperation should not be confused with assigning liability before the evidence is examined.

The family's demand is ultimately for a reliable timeline. Police have said they are trying to determine why Deepak visited the society and who was with him. A prompt post-mortem report, preserved camera footage and transparent communication with relatives will be the clearest way to answer those questions without allowing rumour to fill the gaps.